D660 - A page per title

Status: assumed Date: 2026-09-09

What existed, and what it could not say

compat/<title>.toml has held one record per title for months, split deliberately: what orbistoun sets is written by a person with a reason, and what it got is transcribed from a trace and never typed - because "a hand-written grade drifts the moment somebody is optimistic, and nothing can check it afterwards". compat markdown renders them into one ranked table.

What it could not say is what a title is. Every row was an identifier, so the corpus read as PPSA02664, PPSA25872, PPSA28061 - and nobody working on it could tell you which was which.

Derived, because the alternative is the thing the split exists to prevent

The obvious answer is a template.md and a hand-written page per title. That puts the drift back one level up: stale the first time somebody records a run and forgets to edit prose, and unfalsifiable in exactly the way the status half is built to avoid.

So the metadata is read from sce_sys/param.json, which the title ships and which names itself, and the pages are generated from the records every time. Nothing is typed and there is nothing to go stale. The localised name is preferred over the top-level one, because that is where a title puts the name a person sees; the default language names itself, so nothing here picks a locale.

The corpus, immediately:

identifier title
PPSA02664 Alex Kidd in Miracle World DX
PPSA03416 Summer Sports Games
PPSA04263 Grand Theft Auto V
PPSA21564 ASTRO BOT
PPSA25872 Terminator 2D: NO FATE
PPSA28061 Earthion

The name sits beside the identifier rather than replacing it: the id is what every other artefact keys on - traces, records, requests to sibling projects - and a table showing only names could not be read against any of them.

Absent things are shown, and the two kinds of absent are told apart

A page renders every row whether or not there is anything in it, because a page that omits what it lacks cannot be told from one that was never finished. Two distinctions are kept:

Menu and gameplay both always appear. A title that reaches a menu and one that has never drawn a pixel produce the same shape of page, so the difference between them is the image rather than the layout.

Status is assumed

Nothing here is measured - it is a presentation decision about material already measured elsewhere, and its shape was asked for rather than derived. The one substantive claim, that deriving beats typing, is the same argument compat/README.md already makes about grades.

A bug this found in itself

The first version refreshed the metadata and then returned early when the run was not better than the record - so the name it had just read was thrown away on every title except one that happened to improve. Every title in the corpus is at its best already, so every record would have been skipped. Caught by looking at a generated page and finding it empty, which is the argument for generating them where somebody will look.