Tier one: the loop writes its own patch

Three tiers scaffolded (D296), first one built. From a clean machine - no policy anywhere:

$ orbistoun-cli turn titles/PPSA02664-app0/eboot.bin --apply
8 finding(s), 4 step(s), 3 of them mechanical
  swept: OutParameter { slot: 0, offset: 1048544, answer: Some(0) }
  *** gave it a region at 0x50000000: reached 25 against 23, faulting at 0x0
  proposing sceKernelReserveVirtualRange: needs ConformanceCheck
    assumes: 0x200000 bytes is a guess: the sweep measured where the guest
             faulted, not how much it asked for
  wrote 1 entr(y/ies) to ...\learned.toml

$ orbistoun-cli run titles/PPSA02664-app0/eboot.bin
  fault    image+0xafcc08   (was image+0xafc959)
  verdict  FURTHER  executed code it could not reach before

No human input, no code, no rebuild. The hand-written implementation from earlier is gone; the entry the loop wrote does the same job.

The three properties that make it safe to run unattended

What tier one deliberately will not do

Evidence is a field on the patch rather than a judgement at the point of reading. A patch that changes only a return value may be kept on FURTHER; one that writes memory may not, and needs a conformance check. FURTHER says the guest went further, not that the behaviour is right - and a copy n with the wrong n produces FURTHER and corrupts state that surfaces somewhere unrelated. That is principle 3's opening sentence, and it is the one thing that would make an autopatcher worse than nothing.

Two caught by lints, one of them real