D034 - Two package entries were derived rather than cited, and there is a command that re-derives them

D033 said the six unknown entries all vary between titles and concluded the block was firm. That was the right measurement and the wrong conclusion drawn from it. "Varies between titles" does not mean "cannot be computed" - it means "is not a constant", and the two are different.

Challenged on it, the honest position turned out to be that this project already derives format meaning from material where the derivation is arithmetic a machine can check: obSCEne's vendor tag assignment came from adjacencies like RELA + RELASZ == HASH holding across every module, and D008 settled a current-generation tag by counting. Principle 5 forbids inventing a meaning nothing tests. It does not forbid stating a falsifiable hypothesis and running it.

Two survived every sample:

Both computable, which is why they were worth chasing. A writer produces them from data it already holds, and derive::digest_table and derive::entry_table_copy do exactly that.

Four remain unknown - 0x80, 0x400, 0x401, 0x1002 - and are not guessed at. 0x80 is partly digest-shaped (one of its twelve slots is the digest of param.sfo); the other three are dense and high-entropy in every sample.